English Language Page
4. General Matching for Hate Speech Types and Targets

Unlike in the previous chapters, the tables in this chapter contain all data, including zeros, in order to more conveniently make comparisons.

In order to be able to place the tables on a single page, hate speech types have been identified with the use of capitalized letters of the Roman alphabet.

For the sake of convenience, we once again provide the list types, although without comments:
A. Making direct and straightforward calls for violence;
B. Calling for violence in the form of generalized slogans;
C. Advancing direct and straightforward calls for discriminatory practices;
D. Issuing calls for discriminatory practices in the form of generalized slogans;
E. Releasing veiled calls for violence and discriminatory practices;
F. Creating a nefarious image of the given ethnic community or religious group;
G. Justifying historic cases of violence and discrimination;
H. Releasing publications and/or pronouncements designed to cast doubt on universally recognized historical facts of violence and discrimination;
I. Mentioning the name of an ethnic community or religious group in a derogatory way;
J. Making statements to the effect that an ethnic community or religious group is inherently deficient;
K. Claiming that certain historical crimes had been committed by an ethnic community or religious group;
L. Pointing out (for the purpose of getting the target discredited) that an ethnic community or religious group has been maintaining links with Russian or foreign political or government structures;
M. Claiming that an ethnic community or religious group is criminal by nature;
N. Pointing out that an ethnic community or religious group has some inherent moral deficiencies;
O. Making remarks that an ethnic community or religious group is disproportionately well-off, over-represented in government structures or mass media operations, etc.;
P. Accusing an ethnic community or religious group of negative influences on the society or government (for example, “The Russian national identity gets diluted,” etc.);
Q. Portraying certain ethnic communities or religious groups or their representatives in a derogatory or insulting context;
R. Calling for action to prevent migrants of an ethnic community or religious group from settling in the given region (community, neighborhood, etc.);
S. Providing quoted observations or phrases without commentary.


4.1. MATTER JUDGED TO BE SUPPORTIVE OF HATE SPEECH

Total articles selected: 165


.ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRS
Non-whites0000000000000000000
Non-Slavs1111132211100112120
Africans0000010010001000010
Asian ethnic communities1111151141103111230
Caucasus and trans-Caucasus ethnic communities11112821022013312220
Central Asian ethnic communities1111111100106111330
Americans1311493405100422212
Jews11213102511301445212
Ukrainians0000020050001110200
Roma0000040000009100100
Chechens12111103202209213320
Azeris1111141100105111120
Non-Russians1211911561110216<7250
Non-Christians1111121100100121110
Non-Orthodox (possible Christians)0000020000000001000
Muslims1111161202108<6<13310
Catholics (and Uniats)1111121200101112210
Jehovah’s Witnesses0000020000000001000
Scientologists0000010000000000000
New and small-sized religious groups0000000000000000000
Estonians0000010011000011000
Arabs1111141100102212110
Afghans1111121102101122210
Pakistanis0000000010001000000
Armenians1111151100102123240
Meskhetian Turks10200140000008014280
Kurds1111121100100111130
New Muslim teachings0000000000000000000
Russians000002000100020000
Tartars0000010000000000000


Numbers above five are in boldface type.

We are aware of the dominant hate speech types and targets from the first tables. What conclusions can be drawn from the above information?

Roma and Central Asian ethnic communities appear to have been mentioned primarily because of perceived connections with local crime gangs. Though it hardly comes as a surprise, (particularly given the drug trafficking problem) the same could be said of the Azeris, though the latter have also been slandered and defamed in other ways. Suffering the same general fate have been Caucasus-origin ethnic communities and Meskhetian Turks. Notably, the Chechens appear to be more defamed for their “overall image” rather than for their alleged relations to criminal activities.

The dominant hate speech types were expected to be more applicable to Armenians, Jews or Americans, so it seems to be rather strange that Jehovah’s Witnesses, for one, have been made a target for such perceptions.
Admittedly, the data is too sketchy to allow categorization of the type of hate speech directed against the Jehovah’s Witnesses.

4.2. MATTER JUDGED AS CENSURING HATE SPEECH

Total articles selected: 35

00
.ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRS
Non-whites1010000000000000000
Non-Slavs0100000000000011010
Africans0000000000011000000
Asian ethnic communities0000000000000003020
Caucasus and trans-Caucasus ethnic communities3200040000002114060
Central Asian ethnic communities0000000000011013020
Americans0100000000000020000
Jews1020030110011040000
Ukrainians0000000000000000000
Roma0000100000021000000
Chechens1010000000001000000
Azeris0000010000000010010
Non-Russians1000200100012023011
Non-Christians0000000000000010000
Non-Orthodox (possible Christians)0000000000000000000
Muslims0001110000012220010
Catholics (and Uniats)0000000000000000000
Jehovah’s Witnesses0000000000000000000
Scientologists0000000000000000000
New and small-sized religious groups0000000000000000000
Estonians0000000000000000000
Arabs0000000000000000000
Afghans1000000000001012010
Pakistanis0000000000000010000
Armenians0100000000000010010
Meskhetian Turks0000000000000000000
Kurds0000000000000000000
New Muslim teachings0000000000000010000
Russians0000000000000000000
Tartars0000000000000000000


The media community has been particularly active and “consistent” in condemning hate speech practices directed against the Caucasus and trans-Caucasus ethnic communities, Muslims and Jews. There are several reasons for this, the first of which is the fact that the media’s condemnation comes in response to a torrent of hate speech directed at these groups (i.e., the more hate speech exists, the more there is to condemn). Second, a concerted effort was made to prevent the post September 11 propaganda campaign from causing anti-Muslim hysteria (with an analogous campaign was and is still being carried out related to the war in Chechnya). Third, anti-Semitism has traditionally been associated with aggressive and harsh encroachments on democratic values.



Back
Íàøà êíîïêà    Rambler's Top100 ßíäåêñ öèòèðîâàíèÿ