English Language Page
3. Regional Tables

At this point in time it is nearly impossible to define the principal distinctions between federal-level and regional-level print media. However, in comparing federal-level and regional-level indicators, there is one finding that stands out. While on the federal level the neutral-positive hate speech perception ratio is 3/1, the similar comparison for the regional-level is 13/1.

3.1. Kemerovo Region

Òàble 3.1.1. Hate Speech Types

Typeneutral (8)negative (2)positive (9)Total
Releasing veiled calls for violenceAnd discriminatory practices0011
Justifying historic cases of violence and discrimination1001
Pointing out (for the purpose of getting the target discredited) that an ethnic community or religious group has been maintaining links with Russian or foreign political or government structures0101
Making statements to the effect that an ethnic community or religious group is inherently deficient (i.e. lacking in culture or intellectual capacity, being unable to undertake creative pursuits)3025
Claiming that an ethnic community or religious group is criminal by nature2136
Pointing out that an ethnic community or religious group has some inherent moral deficiencies1012
Making remarks that an ethnic community or religious group is disproportionately well-off, over-represented in government agencies or mass media operations, etc.0011
Portraying certain ethnic communities or religious groups or their representatives in a derogatory or insulting context2035
Providing quoted observations or phrases without commentary1023
Mentioning the name of an ethnic community or religious group in a derogatory way1012
Creating a nefarious image of the given ethnic community or religious group3036
Total1421733



Òàble 3.1.2. Hate Speech Targets

TargetsNeutral (6)negative (2)positive (7)Total
Caucasus and trans-Caucasus ethnic communities0022
Central Asian ethnic communities1001
Americans2013
Jews21.3
Ukrainians0022
Roma0011
Chechens0011
Non-Russians1124
Estonians1001
Russians0011
Tartars1001
Total821020


We have eliminated the “materials by category” and “character types” tables because of scarcity of the pertinent regional-level articles. Those tables would be unlikely to yield any significant information.


3. 2. Krasnodar Territory

The region’s primary distinction comes in the nearly total absence of articles where the author has censured the hate speech examples cited.

Accordingly, the following tables have lost one column.


Òàble 3.2.1. Hate Speech Types

Typeneutral (6)positive (8)Total
Making direct and straightforward calls for violence011
Advancing direct and straightforward calls for discriminatory practices022
Claiming that an ethnic community or religious group is criminal by nature31013
Making remarks that an ethnic community or religious group is disproportionately well-off, over-represented in government agencies or mass media operations, etc.112
Accusing an ethnic community or religious group of negative influences on the society or government (e.g., “The Russian national identity is being diluted by...”, etc.)055
Portraying certain ethnic communities or religious groups or their representatives in a derogatory or insulting context022
Calling for action to prevent migrants of an ethnic community or religious group, from settling in the given region (community, neighborhood, etc.)21113
Providing quoted observations or phrases without commentary101
Mentioning the name of an ethnic community or religious group in a derogatory way101
Creating a nefarious image of the given ethnic community or religious group72431
Total155671



Òàble 2.3.2. Hate Speech Targets

TargetsNeutral (7)Positive (13)Total
Non-Slavs101
Africans011
Caucasus and trans-Caucasus ethnic communities022
Jews011
Roma134
Chechens202
Non-Russians31114
Non-Christians011
Non-Orthodox (possible Christians) 022
Muslims101
Catholics (and Uniats) 011
Jehovah’s Witnesses022
Scientologists011
Armenians167
Meskhetian Turks31821
Kurds022
Total125163


Òàble 3.2.3. Materials by Category


Category of MaterialNeutralPositiveTotal
Editor’s perspective022
Interview538
Article01515
News report268
Reprint112
Reader’s letter145
Total93140



Òàble 3.2.4. Character Types


Character TypeNeutralPositiveTotal
Politician41115
Journalist21517
Government official101
Layman134
Law Enforcement Personnel101
Public figure022
Religious figure011
Total93241


3.3. PERM REGION

Results for negative and neutral findings are zero, and therefore these result columns have been omitted in the tables for the Perm region monitoring. Admittedly, there have been rather few reports of hate speech in the region.

Òàble 3.3.1. Hate Speech Types

TypePositive (5)
Making statements to the effect that an ethnic community or religious group is inherently deficient (i.e. lacking in culture or intellectual capacities, inability to undertake creative pursuits) 1
Claiming that an ethnic community or religious group is criminal by nature6
Making remarks that an ethnic community or religious group is disproportionately well-off, over-represented in government agencies or mass media operations, etc. 1
Accusing an ethnic community or religious group of negative influences on the society or government (for example, “The Russian national identity is being diluted by...”, etc.)1
Creating a nefarious image of the given ethnic community or religious group4
Total13



Òàble 3.3.2. Hate Speech Targets


TargetsPositive (9)
Caucasus and trans-Caucasus ethnic communities2
Central Asian ethnic communities2
Americans1
Chechens1
Azeris1
Arabs1
Afghans1
Armenians1
Tartars1
Total11



Òàble 3.3.3. Materials by Category

Category of Material.
Interview3
Article3
News report2
Reprint2
Fiction1
Total11



Table 3.3.4. Character Types


Character Type.
Journalist8
Law Enforcement Personnel2
Total10



3.4. RYAZAN REGION

Table 3.4.1. Hate Speech Types


TypeNeutral (5)Negative (6)Positive (18)Total
Making direct and straightforward calls for violence0011
Calling for violence in the form of generalized slogans0033
Advancing direct and straightforward calls for discriminatory practices0022
Issuing calls for discriminatory practices in the form of generalized slogans0011
Releasing veiled calls for violence and discriminatory practices021012
Releasing publications and/or pronouncements designed to cast doubt on universally recognized historical facts of violence and discrimination0167
Pointing out (for the purpose of getting the target discredited) that an ethnic community or religious group has been maintaining links with Russian or foreign political or government agencies021012
Making statements to the effect that an ethnic community or religious group is inherently deficient (i.e. lacking in culture or intellectual capacity, being unable to undertake creative pursuits)0044
Claiming that certain historical crimes had been committed by an ethnic community or religious group0022
Claiming that an ethnic community or religious group is criminal by nature1236
Pointing out that an ethnic community or religious group has some inherent moral deficiencies0022
Making remarks that ethnic community or religious group is disproportionately well-off, over-represented in government agencies or mass media operations, etc.03811
Accusing an ethnic community or religious group of negative influences on the society or government (for example, “The Russian national identity is being diluted by...”, etc.)1089
Portraying certain ethnic communities or religious groups or their representatives in a derogatory or insulting context0022
Calling for action preventing migrants of an ethnic community or religious group, from settling in a given region (community, neighborhood, etc.)0011
Providing quoted observations or phrases without commentary1124
Mentioning the name of an ethnic community or religious group in a derogatory way1023
Creating a nefarious image of the given ethnic community or religious group201214
Total6117996




Table 3.4.2. Hate Speech Targets


TargetsNeutral (4)Negative (16)Positive (18)Total
Non-Slavs0134
Africans0101
Asian ethnic communities0011
Caucasus and trans-Caucasus ethnic communities0123
Central Asian ethnic communities1214
Americans0268
Jews11911
Roma0202
Chechens0145
Azeris0112
Non-Russians031316
Non-Christians0123
Muslims0336
Catholics (and Uniats)0011
Estonians0011
Arabs1012
Afghans1124
Pakistanis0101
Armenians0112
Kurds0011
Russians0011
New Muslim teachings0101
Total4235380




Table 3.4.3. Materials by Category


Category of MaterialNeutralNegativePositiveTotal
Editor’s perspective0011
Interview0213
Article241218
News report0101
Reprint0066
Joke0055
Classified and commercial ads0022
Total272736




Table 3.4.4. Character Types


Character TypeNeutralNegativePositiveTotal
Politician0112
Journalist141621
Cultural worker0011
Layman1001
Judge0101
Law enforcement personnel0101
Public figure0044
Total272231



3.5. ST. PETERSBURG

Table 3.5.1. Hate Speech Types

TypeNeutral (6)Negative (4)Positive (7)Total
Issuing calls for discriminatory practices in the form of generalized slogans0101
Releasing publications and/or pronouncements designed to cast doubt on universally recognized historical facts of violence and discrimination1113
Calling for action to prevent migrants of an ethnic community or religious group, from settling in the given region (community, neighborhood, etc.)0101
Making statements to the effect that an ethnic community or religious group is inherently deficient (i.e. lacking in culture or intellectual capacity, being unable to undertake creative pursuits)1012
Claiming that an ethnic community or religious group is criminal by nature0055
Pointing out that an ethnic community or religious group has some inherent moral deficiencies1012
Making remarks that an ethnic community or religious group is disproportionately well-off, over-represented in government agencies or mass media operations, etc.0011
Portraying certain ethnic communities or religious groups or their representatives in a derogatory or insulting context2046
Calling for action to prevent migrants of an ethnic community or religious group, from settling in a given region (community, neighborhood, etc.)1001
Creating a nefarious image of the given ethnic community or religious group811423
Total1442745



Table 3.5.2. Hate Speech Targets

TargetsNeutral (13, 11) Negative (2,2)Positive (27, 10)Total
Non-whites1001
Africans2002
Asian ethnic communities1012
Caucasus and trans-Caucasus ethnic communities1001
Central Asian ethnic communities0022
Americans1056
Jews1124
Roma0011
Chechens2035
Azeris0033
Non-Russians1012
Muslims1179
Catholics (and Uniats)0022
Estonians1001
Afghans1001
Total1322742




Table 3.5.3. Materials by Category

Category of MaterialNeutralNegativepositiveTotal
Editor’s perspective0022
Interview2002
Article711624
News report0145
Joke3003
Total1222236



Table 3.5.4. Character Types


Character TypeNeutralNegativePositiveTotal
Journalist901019
Expert321015
Cultural worker0011
Total1222135


GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE REGIONS

The press in the Krasnodar territory (40 entries) appears to be particularly focused on local problems. Over half of the filed entries are dedicated to the issue of migrants (Meskhetian Turks, Armenians, Roma, Kurds, Chechens, “non-indigenous” communities). The material that was surveyed, for the most part, was related to public appearances by the regional authorities, primarily by A. Tkachev, Governor of the Krasnodar territory. The regional leadership’s sentiments could generally be characterized as following an observation made by the Governor: “Kuban is for Kubanites! Yes, Kuban is a multiethnic region; however, Russians are the core ethnic community. Everybody who comes here needs to adapt to our ways, our customs and traditions …” Not only “non-indigenous” communities are unwelcome and unloved by local authorities but also “foreign” religions (Catholics, Protestants, and particularly Jehovah’s Witnesses and Scientologists). The two major issues that have been the focus of public attention are “non-Russian” migrants and the persisting ethnic tensions allegedly generated by the criminal nature of the local “migrants.” Following the substitution of A. Tkachev for N. Kondratenko as regional head, “anti-Zionism” has become less of an issue, although it is still very much present. For example, according to A. Tkachev, the federal-level NTV television network keeps attacking the Kuban authorities because it employs people like V. Shenderovich and S. Shuster. Unlike other Russian regions where puns could be exchanged on the topic of ethnic relations, within the Krasnodar territory such mundane things appear to carry high-level official connotations.

Out of the 29 Ryazan-origin hate speech entries, six were politically incorrect and basically harmless jokes. The Ryazan-based newspapers and magazines are keen on printing historical-philosophical and geopolitical articles smacking of nationalistic supremacy. One can easily find for example an RNE (Russian National Unity) leaflet carried by a local daily as a congratulatory message on the organization’s eleventh anniversary or excerpts from the book by David Duke (former Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan) on the true role of Jews in today’s world. Overall, the publications originating in Ryazan have been rather discursive, with personalized observations on historical topics relating little to pressing regional issues of the day. The regional media appear to be rather tolerant of calls of the “Jews get out of Russia!”-type. What is more, the local papers can tell you that D. Dudaev “disappeared” because he was a Jew and that the Jews who owned the industrial facility on the Lena River at the beginning of the XIX century were responsible for the execution-by-fire of Russian industrial workers there. Reporters in Ryazan sought to criminalize Caucasus-origin migrants, though this topic appears to be tertiary in relevance to subjects reported upon. Residents of Ryazan and the region seem to be so fond of reading about history and geopolitics that hate speech practices with regard to members of the larger migrant communities have been reported as nearly negligible. However, one might conclude that a migrant-related problem (should it ever become significant there) would be handled just as in the Krasnodar territory. This conjecture seems to be plausible, particularly given that the Ryazan region, with its population being 96% Russian, has always been characterized by a very high level of nationalistic sentiments.

St. Petersburg (34) rests in a middle ground, between “soft” Perm and Kemerovo and “hard” Ryazan and Krasnodar. Nearly half the mentions are attributed to the September 11 attacks, anti-Americanism and anti-Islamism; the remaining responses address the criminality of Chechens, Azeris, Tajiks, Roma and Syrians. In addition, there have been other external political attacks (against Jews and Arabs) and discussion of a high-profile pop-star’s father-in-law being Jewish by origin. At this point in time, we do not have enough data to conclude whether the situation in St. Petersburg is the result of the city being a megalopolis or its “inferiority complex,” a by-product of its “second capital” status. Whatever the reason, while Moscow’s “amateur-politicians” have been marginalized, those from St. Petersburg have been placed in the “‘mainstream.”

In Perm (11) hate speech practices appear to be limited to the following: articles written to promote stereotyping an ethnic group as criminal, ethnic humor, defaming statements with regard to aliens and Chechens, the latter statements being war-related.

In Kemerovo (30) the relevant hate speech examples, while basically rather soft (limited to unintentional turns of speech), appear to be somewhat defamatory with regard to certain ethnic communities (Ukrainians, Uzbeks, Afghans, Americans). One report refers to a local resident alleging that “all Chechens are thieves.”

Rather low levels of hate speech manifestations in the latter two Russian regions seem to be explained by the fact that those provinces have few migrants, though Ryazan clearly is an exception to this logic.



Back

Íàøà êíîïêà    Rambler's Top100 ßíäåêñ öèòèðîâàíèÿ